>AC Grayling – Book Review: Questions of Truth: God, Science and Belief by John Polkinghorne and Nicholas Beale | New Humanist



This ponts to why aupernaturalism leads to nonsense; faith doth that to people!
Besides the scientific god of the gaps, the explanatory god of the god exists: BothAquinas in his etiological [ Primaty Cause] and Leibniz in his principle of sufficient explanation, err in thiking that He adds an extra dimension to explanations whilst we naturalists note,no, their God does no more than He wills what He wills, that tauology, which means no more than God did it, and no more sensible as the supreme explanaton above whatever natural explanation and cause we find.
Read Victor Stengers ” God: the Failed Hypothesis” to fahom better all this.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s