>Review of "In Defense of Miracles"


>

Review of In Defense of Miracles (1999, 2005)

Richard Carrier

 

In Defense of Miracles (cover)

1. Summary
2. What’s Good and Bad

3. The Philosophical Problem

(a) The Shaky Groundwork of Corduan and Purtill
(b) Nash on Naturalism vs. Christian Theism
(c) Moreland’s “Christian Science”
(d) Beck’s Argument for God

4. The Historical Problem

(a) Beckwith on Historiography
(b) Geivett’s Exercise in Hyperbole
(c) Clark’s Survey of Other Religions
(d) Newman on Prophecy as Miracle
(e) Craig’s Empty Tomb & Habermas on Visions

Hume’s corollary to the presumption of naturalism requres evidence to validate miracles. But we skeptics find that people misremember things, want to believe in miracles and otherwise people have a predisposition to believe in miracles. We find only natural forces at work, and often fraud intrudes.
Gppgle Richard Carrier for his most excellent essays and books.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s